Fletcher Scott vs Daniil Ostapenkov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W L L L W L
Form
W W W L W L W W W LH2H: Scott 1 - 0 Ostapenkov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Scott winning 2 and Ostapenkov winning 1. The last match between Scott and Ostapenkov was at the M15 Antalya, 10-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Fletcher Scott getting the victory 3-6 6-3 10-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fletcher Scott | 1 |
| Daniil Ostapenkov | 0 |
| Scott | Stats | Ostapenkov |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 79% (19-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 898 |
| Highest Rank | 840 | |
| 26 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (76-65) | Career Total W/L | 64% (102-57) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Scott VS Ostapenkov H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 10-4 | |||||
Scott VS Ostapenkov H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Fletcher Scott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Alexander Petrov
Player
Fletcher Scott
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Fletcher Scott
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Fletcher Scott
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Fletcher Scott
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Elijah Strode
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Fletcher Scott
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maciej Rajski
Player
Fletcher Scott
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
28 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Fletcher Scott
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
81%
(
34 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Cihan Akay
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniil Ostapenkov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joris De Loore
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
52 of
68)
15
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Daniil Bogatov
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Leonardo Borrelli
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Yukun Wang
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Federico Bondioli
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Martin Krumich
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
17 of
31)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
13 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Daniil Chizhuk
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (76/65) | Win/Loss | 64% (102/57) |
| 55% (172/142) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (218/124) |
| 53% (1521/1334) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (1716/1290) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 94 | Aces Total | 441 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 141 | Total Double Faults | 292 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 260.96 | Average Opponent Rank | 310.96 |
| 72% (3015/4203) | 1st Serve % | 63% (4147/6609) |
| 60% (1824/3015) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2821/4147) |
| 48% (572/1188) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1163/2473) |
| 44% (178/402) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (361/775) |
| 41% (1682/4103) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2902/6772) |
| 54% (76/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (100/155) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (13/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (8/24) |
| 38% (12/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 85% (85/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (106/98) |
| 15% (85/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (106/8) |
| 7% (56/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (53/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
